Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Abiko Cable lugs and C-clamps (en) en

A more recent version of this data set exists in the database.

Most recent version of this data set:00.00.012

Key Data Set Information
Location EU-27
Geographical representativeness description The results of this EPD are representative for Norway, UK, and the EU.
Reference year 2024
Name
Abiko Cable lugs and C-clamps
Use advice for data set The applications of cable lugs and C-clamps are extensive, covering various electrical uses in industrial, utility, rail, automotive and domestic machinery and systems. To use cable lugs or C-clamps, the stripped end of a wire is inserted into the barrel of the lug, which is then crimped with special certified tools to secure the connection. The purpose of the product is to ensure efficient electrical conductivity.
Technical purpose of product or process The applications of cable lugs and C-clamps are extensive, covering various electrical uses in industrial, utility, rail, automotive and domestic machinery and systems. To use cable lugs or C-clamps, the stripped end of a wire is inserted into the barrel of the lug, which is then crimped with special certified tools to secure the connection. The purpose of the product is to ensure efficient electrical conductivity.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 4.4.04 Metalle / Kupfer / Schmiede- und Gussteile aus Kupfer und Messing
General comment on data set The owner of this EPD shall be liable for the underlying information and evidence. The programme operator Kiwa-Ecobility Experts shall not be liable with respect to manufacturer data, life cycle assessment data and evidence. This is a Cradle to gate with options, modules C1-C4 and module D EPD.
Scenarios
  • Scenario: Standard scenario (Default) - The product is assumed to have a lifespan of 80 years, based on Abiko's experience and the lifespan of the components to which the cable lugs or C-clamps are connected. The customers are primarily located in Scandinavia. The transport distance to these customers was estimated based on the average distance from Abiko's office to the central regions of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. To calculate the surface area (m²) of the cable lugs and C-clamps, a rectangular approximation is used. This method is chosen due to the complex geometry of the products, making precise surface measurement difficult. The calculation is based on the largest and heaviest product variant to ensure that the estimated area fully encompasses all smaller variants. The surface area is determined using the formula: Area = Length × Width. All scenarios included are currently in use and are representative for one of the most likely scenario alternatives.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Content declaration
NameMass (%)Mass (kg)RenewableRecyclableRecycledCAS numberEC numberComment
Product
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.02911 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description Data is collected from Ingeniørfirma ABIKO norsk AS for the reference period of 1 year from Jan 2024 to December 2024.
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Ingeniørfirma ABIKO Norsk AS cable lugs and C-clamps are produced by cutting/ tumbling/heating copper tubes/profiles to the appropriate temperature for processing. The tubes are then punched and machined into the specified shape before the surface is tinned, the C-profiles are cut and marked accordingly. Compression cable lugs and C-clamps provide the most reliable and durable connection points for cables in electrical installations. The copper tubular compression lugs, suitable for copper cables ranging from 0,75 to 800 mm², and from 1 gram to 1750 gram, are tinned and feature an inspection hole. The C-clamps suitable for branch and splicing earth cables ranging 6-300mm² and from 1 gram to 255 grams. This declaration pertains to one unit of cable lugs with the weight of 1,75 kg which serves as the declared unit in this EPD. This EPD represents a worst-case scenario, covering the largest and heaviest product variant within the product range. All other variations of Ingeniørfirma ABIKO Norsk AS cable lugs and C-clamps that are smaller in size and weight and all produced at the same locations described in the production process, are also included within the scope of this declaration. The process begins with the production of raw materials, copper and tin. The copper is then formed into tubes. These tubes are transported to a facility where they are pressed into tubular cable lugs and C-clamps ranging from 0,75 to 800 mm². The tin, which is a recycled product, is alloyed onto the copper tubes. Finally, the finished product is transported to Ingeniørfirma ABIKO Norsk AS warehouse in Oslo.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • Flow Chart of Abiko Cable lugs and C-clamps Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.4193
  • 0.001524
  • -0.004056
  • 0.0004915
  • 0
  • 0.00004727
  • 0.0002905
  • 0.00002667
  • -0.4314
Output
  • 0.000769
  • 0.00005447
  • 0.00002207
  • 0.00001297
  • 0
  • 0.000001247
  • 0.000003242
  • 9.879E-8
  • -0.0003795
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09918
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.665
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.662
  • 0.3188
  • 0.07092
  • 0.1344
  • 0
  • 0.01292
  • 0.01763
  • 0.0878
  • -5.937
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 218.1
  • 9.666
  • 3.97
  • 2.037
  • 0
  • 0.1959
  • 0.5851
  • 0.02133
  • -121.7
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1218
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 218.1
  • 9.666
  • 4.092
  • 2.037
  • 0
  • 0.1959
  • 0.5851
  • 0.02133
  • -121.7
Input
  • 54.87
  • 0.1011
  • 0.8127
  • 0.02875
  • 0
  • 0.002765
  • 0.09069
  • 0.001419
  • -37.49
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.011
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 54.87
  • 0.1011
  • 1.824
  • 0.02875
  • 0
  • 0.002765
  • 0.09069
  • 0.001419
  • -37.49
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000487
  • 0.000001611
  • 0.000005064
  • 4.654E-7
  • 0
  • 4.476E-8
  • 0.000001185
  • 1.674E-8
  • -0.0002804
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
  • 71.32
  • 9.659
  • -4.619
  • 2.033
  • 0
  • 0.1956
  • 0.585
  • 0.02133
  • -121.7
  • 146.9
  • 0.000001409
  • 8.719
  • 4.446E-7
  • 0
  • 4.276E-8
  • 0.000002657
  • 2.266E-9
  • -0.01804
  • 1.207
  • 0.01378
  • -0.01515
  • 0.0006798
  • 0
  • 0.00006537
  • 0.0004833
  • 0.000006067
  • -1.259
  • 308.5
  • 1.196E-8
  • 18.44
  • 2.526E-9
  • 0
  • 2.43E-10
  • 6.854E-10
  • 2.71E-11
  • -1.294E-7
  • 0.04673
  • 0.000004841
  • 0.002517
  • 0.000001412
  • 0
  • 1.358E-7
  • 0.000001969
  • 7.853E-9
  • -0.003414
  • 0.01286
  • 0.003641
  • -0.001992
  • 0.0002583
  • 0
  • 0.00002485
  • 0.0001101
  • 0.000002546
  • -0.04135
  • 0.1835
  • 0.04007
  • -0.03141
  • 0.002755
  • 0
  • 0.000265
  • 0.001258
  • 0.00002763
  • -0.615
  • 0.219
  • 0.0001867
  • -0.1053
  • 0.00004625
  • 0
  • 0.000004448
  • 0.0001295
  • 0.000001374
  • -0.03183
  • 17.62
  • 0.7338
  • 0.2904
  • 0.142
  • 0
  • 0.01365
  • 0.04314
  • 0.0009324
  • -10.06
  • 0.03228
  • 0.00147
  • 0.0008611
  • 0.0005061
  • 0
  • 0.00004867
  • 0.00006321
  • 2.247E-7
  • -0.02095
  • 17.87
  • 0.7354
  • 0.186
  • 0.1425
  • 0
  • 0.01371
  • 0.04333
  • 0.000934
  • -10.12
  • 0.0513
  • 0.01127
  • -0.009999
  • 0.0009406
  • 0
  • 0.00009046
  • 0.0003767
  • 0.00001029
  • -0.1936
  • 2.848
  • 0.0366
  • -1.069
  • 0.0111
  • 0
  • 0.001068
  • 0.007092
  • 0.00009722
  • -18.5

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 479.8
  • 5.901
  • -46.78
  • 1.501
  • 0
  • 0.1443
  • 0.4585
  • 0.7488
  • -1021
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.6674
  • 3.487E-10
  • 0.03975
  • 7.52E-11
  • 0
  • 7.23E-12
  • 6.58E-11
  • 9.7E-13
  • -2.143E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.0000031
  • 5.172E-9
  • -0.000001142
  • 1.633E-9
  • 0
  • 1.571E-10
  • 2.965E-9
  • 7.289E-11
  • -0.00001935
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.2373
  • 0.002854
  • -0.02528
  • 0.0007934
  • 0
  • 0.0000763
  • 0.001556
  • 0.00003055
  • -0.4714
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 86.84
  • 4.028
  • -13.92
  • 1.605
  • 0
  • 0.1543
  • 1.038
  • 0.05057
  • -396.5
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 903.9
  • 4.393E-8
  • 54.05
  • 1.402E-8
  • 0
  • 1.348E-9
  • 6.623E-9
  • 1.479E-10
  • -0.000002222