| Key Data Set Information | |
| Location | BE |
| Geographical representativeness description | European Union |
| Name |
|
| Technical purpose of product or process | Waterproofing coating for structures in concrete or masonry such as basement walls, basement roofs, joints, foundations, terraces, balconies, decks and pipe penetrations. |
| General comment on data set | AQUAPROOF REACTIVE (TH) is a solvent-free reactive waterproofing coating. AQUAPROOF REACTIVE (TH) is applied by paintbrush or roller to form a flexible waterproof membrane, with adhesion to various surfaces. AQUAPROOF REACTIVE can also be applied on damp surfaces and is suitable for both horizontal and vertical applications. Product types: AQUAPROOF REACTIVE is the standard product type AQUAPROOF REACTIVE TH is the thixotropic type Product packaging: 310 ml / 4 kg / 7.5 kg / 18 kg Indicative consumption: 1,5 kg/m². Product composition: Type of raw materialPercentage (%)Weight per unit (kg)Polymers50 %0.75 kgFillers45 %0.675 kgAdditives5 %0.075 kgAQUAPROOF REACTIVE (TH) has the following certifications: - ETA (European Technical Approval): 25/0246 - ATG (Agrément Technique/Technische goedkeuring): 3344 The EPD declares an average consumption of the product Aquaproof Reactive TH. DensityEN ISO 28111.36 kg/literSolidsEN ISO 325197 %Initial setting 1 hourInstant rain resistanceEN 15816PassWater vapour resistanceEN 1931Sd: 1.5 - 2.5 (µ: 751)Elongation resistanceEN ISO 527-3344%Tensile strength – stress at breakEN ISO 527-31.45 MPa ViscosityEN ISO 3219 4.3 +/- 0,5 mPa.sec Waterproofing EN 14891 A.7. Pass Crackbridging EN 14891 par. A.8. > 0.75 mm Background data was taken from the Ecoinvent 3.9.1 database. The database is regularly checked and thus complies with the requirements of ISO 14040/44 (background data not older than 10 years). The background data meets the requirements of EN 15804. The general rule was followed that specific data from specific production processes or average data derived from specific processes must be given priority when calculating an EPD or Life Cycle Assessment. Data for processes that the manufacturer cannot influence or choose, were backed up with generic data. The following estimates and assumptions have been made for this EPD: Energy: only complete energy information for 2024 is available at the time of drafting this EPD, hence data in this EPD is measured data from 2024. Production waste is quantified based on measured data. Waste generated on construction sites during application is estimated, as it strongly depends on user practices and site conditions. Transport of the finished product to construction site is assumed. The scenarios included are currently in use and are representative for one of the most likely scenario alternatives. According to the criteria of the "UN Environmental Global Guidance on LCA database development" mentioned in EN 15804+A2, the data quality for all three representativeness categories (geographical, technical and time) can be described as good. The calculations have been performed in accordance with the “polluter pays” and “modularity” principles, as defined in EN 15804+A2. |
| Copyright | Yes |
| Owner of data set | |
| Quantitative reference | |
| Reference flow(s) |
|
| Biogenic carbon content |
|
| Time representativeness | |
| Data set valid until | 2031 |
| Time representativeness description | Averages based on data of 2025, except for the data of energy which is based on average values from January to December 2024 (data per month), as data of 2025 was not completely available at the time of drafting this EPD. The assumption is made that energy data did not differ in 2024 and 2025 as there were no changes to the solar panel installation of Hevadex since 2023.All data that is specific to the product and process was provided by the manufacturer for the operating year 2025 (January to December) and is therefore up-to-date. |
| Technological representativeness | |
| Technology description including background system | The applicationis applied using by roller or paintbrush. The loss of product caused by residue in the pails, on the application tools and cleaning losses are considered to be 2 % on average. |
| Flow diagram(s) or picture(s) | |
| LCA methodology report | |||||
| Data sources, treatment and representativeness | |||||
| Documentation of data quality management | |||||
| Data source(s) used for this data set | |||||
| Completeness | |||||
| Validation | |||||
| |||||
| Compliance Declarations | |||||
| Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
|
Nomenclature compliance
|
Methodological compliance
|
Review compliance
|
Documentation compliance
|
Quality compliance
|
| Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
|
Nomenclature compliance
|
Methodological compliance
|
Review compliance
|
Documentation compliance
|
Quality compliance
|
| Data entry by | |
| Time stamp (last saved) | 2026-07-20T13:56:37Z |
| Data set format(s) | |
| Publication and ownership | |
| UUID | b5b06a39-f318-4011-81d5-a129e62c21e7 |
| Data set version | 01.00.000 |
| Registration authority | |
| Registration number | EPD-Kiwa-EE-273469-EN |
| Owner of data set | |
| Copyright | Yes |
| License type | Free of charge for all users and uses |
| Access and use restrictions | None. |
Indicators of life cycle