Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Bilaminat (Masterplast Nyrt) (en) en

A more recent version of this data set exists in the database.

Most recent version of this data set:01.00.010

Key Data Set Information
Location EU-27
Geographical representativeness description European Union
Reference year 2024
Name
Bilaminat (Masterplast Nyrt)
Technical purpose of product or process Bilaminate membranes are versatile solutions suitable for roofing, façade, and wall assemblies. By selecting the appropriate type, they can be easily adapted to a wide range of thermal and moisture management needs. Typical applications include use as underlay membranes, wind barriers, or additional moisture protection layers.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 6.6.03 Kunststoffe / Folien und Vliese / Folien zur Abdichtung
General comment on data set MASTERPLAST’s bilaminate (two‑layer) products are composed of two distinct layers joined through a controlled thermal bonding process. The base layers are typically made from polymers such as polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE) nonwoven materials, combined with additional functional membranes. These materials are designed for use in sectors including construction, healthcare, hygiene, automotive applications, and industrial filtration. Their functional characteristics include increased mechanical strength, resistance to water penetration, vapor permeability, and resistance to various chemicals. The layered configuration can be adapted for specific technical requirements, such as acting as a vapor barrier or incorporating antibacterial or flame‑retardant properties. This Environmental Product Declaration is a representative EPD for the product group, based on a variant with a basis weight of 50 g/m². The composition of the product  MaterialsWeight %Polypropylene99 - 100Additives1 - 2  LinoporeCharasteristicsMethodValueUnitUnit WeightEN 18459-250-90g/m2Nominal tensile strength - MDEN 12311-180-140N/5cmNominal tensile strength - CDEN 12311-160-130N/5cmElongation at maximum load - MDEN 12311-135-50%Elongation at maximum load - CDEN 12311-130-40%Resistance to tearing - MDEN 12310-130-100NResistance to tearing - CDEN 12310-130-100NResistance to water penetrationEN 1928 Method  AW1ClassWater vapour transmission (Sd)EN ISO 12572<0.1m  LinobarrierParameterMethodValueUnitUnit WeightEN 18459-250-100g/m2Nominal tensile strength- MDEN 12311-180-130N/5cmNominal tensile strength- CDEN 12311-180-130N/5cmElongation at maximum load- MDEN 12311-135-40%Elongation at maximum load- CDEN 12311-125-30%Resistance to tearing- MDEN 12310-125-70NResistance to tearing- CDEN 12310-125-70NResistance to water penetrationEN 1928 Method AW1ClassWater vapour transmission (Sd)EN ISO 12572>10m The quality level of geographical representativeness can be considered “good”. The quality level of technical representativeness can be considered “good”. The time representativeness can also be regarded as “good”. The overall data quality for this EPD can, therefore, be described as “good”.  To ensure the comparability of the results, only consistent background data from the ecoinvent database version 3.9.1 (2022) was used in the LCA (e.g. data sets on energy, transports, auxiliary and operating materials). The database is regularly checked and thus complies with the requirements of EN 15804 (background data not older than 10 years). Almost all consistent data sets contained in the ecoinvent database version 3.9.1 are documented and can be viewed in the online documentation. The raw material data were converted into reference flows (input per declared unit).The general rule was followed that specific data from specific production processes or average data derived from specific processes must have priority in the calculation of an LCA. Data for processes over which the manufacturer has no influence were assigned generic data. The LCA calculation was carried out using Nibe's LCA & EPD tool R<THINK. This specific EPD is based on the product variant with a basis weight of 50 g/m². Environmental impacts are calculated per kg of product and converted to per m² using a normalized conversion factor of 1.000 for the declared product. For other commercially available basis weights, the following conversion factors can be applied proportionally. Basis weight (g/m²)Normalized conversion factor (relative to specific EPD)400.800501.000 601.200701.400801.600901.8001002.0001102.2001202.400To derive environmental indicators per m² for any other product variant, multiply the results of this specific EPD by the appropriate factor. The additives account for approximately 1.04% of the total material used. As this falls below the cut-off threshold, they are excluded from the system boundaries in this EPD. The environmental impact results in this EPD are based on the total production data of bilaminat products in various colors. The Environmental Product Declaration complies with the principles of “polluter pays” and “modularity,” ensuring that waste management responsibilities and impacts are allocated appropriately and consistently.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • grammage: 0.05 kg/m^2
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description All process-specific data were collected for the operating year 2024 (January to December).
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Construction phase is outside the scope of the declaration.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • Product Flow Diagram Image
  • Product Picture Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0.05164
  • 0.2006
  • 0.0007773
  • 0.1482
  • 0
  • 0.0002104
  • 0.009533
  • 0.00002377
  • -0.005486
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.944
  • 3.302
  • 0.05845
  • 1.299
  • 0
  • 0.0149
  • 0.08588
  • 0.001285
  • -0.9813
Input
  • 1.639
  • 2.298
  • 0
  • 0.6585
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.07114
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.0009121
  • 0.001589
  • 0.000005808
  • 0.0006716
  • 0
  • 0.000003597
  • 0.0001557
  • 0.000001318
  • -0.000107
Output
  • 6.966E-7
  • 0.000001907
  • 1.442E-7
  • 0.000001066
  • 0
  • 9.489E-8
  • 3.035E-7
  • 6.342E-9
  • -0.000004033
Output
  • 0.003006
  • 0.03149
  • 0.002633
  • 0.02585
  • 0
  • 0.0009835
  • 0.04463
  • 0.005013
  • -0.001158
Output
  • 0.000001283
  • 0.000008307
  • 3.748E-7
  • 0.000006649
  • 0
  • 3.406E-9
  • 1.979E-7
  • 4.321E-10
  • -1.148E-7
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0.00105
  • 0
  • 0.00105
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0025
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0.1053
  • 0
  • 0.1053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2508
Output
  • 0
  • 0.1814
  • 0
  • 0.1814
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4319

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • 3.583
  • 5.595
  • 0.05506
  • 1.957
  • 0
  • 0.01488
  • 0.08588
  • 0.001285
  • -1.052
  • 4.131E-7
  • 0.000001174
  • 9.884E-8
  • 6.616E-7
  • 0
  • 3.254E-9
  • 5.342E-8
  • 1.249E-10
  • -2.909E-8
  • 0.0003309
  • 0.0006606
  • 0.00001843
  • 0.0003112
  • 0
  • 0.000004975
  • 0.00004854
  • 4.295E-7
  • -0.00005089
  • 4.507E-10
  • 2.817E-9
  • 8.284E-10
  • 1.537E-9
  • 0
  • 1.849E-11
  • 3.088E-9
  • 1.384E-12
  • -3.212E-9
  • 0.000001135
  • 0.000002771
  • 2.871E-8
  • 0.000001607
  • 0
  • 1.034E-8
  • 3.263E-7
  • 9.053E-10
  • -1.559E-7
  • 0.00005608
  • 0.0001137
  • 0.000006268
  • 0.00005139
  • 0
  • 0.000001891
  • 0.00001374
  • 2.824E-7
  • -0.00001701
  • 0.0006151
  • 0.001266
  • 0.00006919
  • 0.000582
  • 0
  • 0.00002017
  • 0.0001532
  • 0.000001692
  • -0.0001867
  • 0.0003073
  • 0.0005468
  • 0.00001975
  • 0.0002198
  • 0
  • 0.000006884
  • 0.00004414
  • 7.307E-7
  • -0.0001009
  • 0.0001366
  • 0.0002341
  • 0.000001436
  • 0.00009608
  • 0
  • 3.385E-7
  • 0.00001546
  • 3.53E-7
  • -0.0000105
  • 0.09403
  • 0.1916
  • 0.003622
  • 0.09398
  • 0
  • 0.001039
  • 0.1137
  • 0.0006374
  • -0.0635
  • 0.00002308
  • 0.00004838
  • 0.000001278
  • 0.00002402
  • 0
  • 0.000003704
  • 0.00001101
  • 4.534E-8
  • -0.000005207
  • 0.09419
  • 0.1919
  • 0.003625
  • 0.0941
  • 0
  • 0.001043
  • 0.1137
  • 0.0006378
  • -0.06351
  • 0.06939
  • 0.1061
  • 0.0001533
  • 0.03659
  • 0
  • 0.00008127
  • 0.005238
  • 0.00005395
  • -0.007289

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0.09707
  • 0.8417
  • 0.04409
  • 0.7005
  • 0
  • 0.01098
  • 1.31
  • 0.0009592
  • -0.0292
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.737E-11
  • 4.675E-11
  • 1.238E-12
  • 2.814E-11
  • 0
  • 5.503E-13
  • 2.104E-11
  • 3.52E-14
  • -7.832E-12
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 4.64E-10
  • 1.372E-9
  • 4.8E-11
  • 8.598E-10
  • 0
  • 1.195E-11
  • 2.172E-10
  • 1.379E-12
  • -7.89E-11
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.00162
  • 0.01009
  • 0.0002407
  • 0.008228
  • 0
  • 0.000005806
  • 0.000281
  • 7.081E-7
  • -0.0001544
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0.07567
  • 0.378
  • 0.03797
  • 0.2644
  • 0
  • 0.01174
  • 0.02829
  • 0.002901
  • -0.01323
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 3.567E-9
  • 6.135E-9
  • 2.63E-10
  • 2.305E-9
  • 0
  • 1.026E-10
  • 4.435E-10
  • 9.057E-12
  • -3.153E-10