Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: BOFS - Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location DE
Geographical representativeness description European Union
Name
BOFS - Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag
General comment on data set This specific EPD covers Linz-Donawitz process slag (BOFS), a by-product generated during the conversion of pig iron into crude steel. As a metallurgically inherent material, BOFS is an unavoidable part of the steelmaking process. Due to its defined chemical composition—primarily consisting of iron oxide, calcium oxide, and silicon dioxide—BOFS is particularly well-suited as a high-quality secondary raw material for road construction. When used as aggregate in various construction applications, BOFS is processed under quality-controlled conditions in accordance with the requirements of the relevant harmonized European standards: EN 13043 – Aggregates for bituminous mixtures and surface treatments for roads, airfields, and other trafficked areas EN 13242 – Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials for use in civil engineering work and road construction EN 13383 - Armourstones The specific use of the product is subject to the respective national legal regulations at the place of use, particularly with regard to environmental compatibility, installation classes, and approval procedures. BOFS consists predominantly of oxidic components, particularly iron oxide (Fe₂O₃), calcium oxide (CaO), and silicon dioxide (SiO₂). These are complemented by smaller proportions of aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃), magnesium oxide (MgO), and other trace elements. The composition results from the metallurgical process in the LD converter and is characterized by a crystalline structure with high mechanical strength. BOFS can be recycled and reused for the same purpose after excavation, crushing and screening. According to the German Substitute Building Materials Ordinance (EBV), BOFS is classified as SWS 1. pH value: 9–13 Electrical conductivity (µS/cm): < 10,000 F (mg/l): < 1.1 Cr (µg/l): < 110 Mo (µg/l): < 55 V (µg/l): < 180 Chemical compoundAverage Value [%]Fe total19CaO47SiO₂12MgO2Al₂O₃1.6 The primary data represent iron and steel production in Germany. The quality level of geographical representativity can be considered “good,” the quality level of technical representativity can be considered “good,” and the temporal representativity can also be considered “good.” Therefore, the overall data quality for this EPD can be classified as “good.” To ensure comparability of results, only consistent background data from the ecoinvent database version 3.9.1 was used in the life cycle assessment (e.g. datasets for energy, transport, auxiliary and operating materials), which refer to the reference year 2022. The database is regularly reviewed and thus meets the requirements of EN 15804 (background data not older than 10 years). All consistent datasets contained in the ecoinvent database are documented and can be accessed in the ecoinvent online documentation. For BOFS, only modules A1–A3 are declared since the material is integrated into other construction products (e.g., cement, concrete) and cannot be physically separated or identified at end of life.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description All primary data were collected during the accounting period (01.01.2023 – 31.12.2023).All secondary data were selected with a geographical reference to Germany whenever possible.If datasets with a reference to Germany were not available, datasets were chosen based on the following geographical scope, in descending order: Europe, Global.
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Construction phase is outside the scope of the declaration.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • Product Picture Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Input
  • 0.01596
  • 0.3259
  • 0.001896
  • 0.308
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.8562
  • 37.86
  • 0.1428
  • 36.86
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.00004675
  • 0.02409
  • 0.00001722
  • 0.02403
Output
  • 999.9
  • 999.9
  • 7.322E-7
  • 0.00004646
Output
  • 0.009306
  • 0.1158
  • 0.0009808
  • 0.1055
Output
  • 1.342E-7
  • 0.0001418
  • 3.906E-8
  • 0.0001417
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
  • 0.8562
  • 37.86
  • 0.1428
  • 36.86
  • 8.691E-8
  • 0.0000129
  • 1.541E-8
  • 0.0000128
  • 0.0001109
  • 0.00686
  • 0.0002708
  • 0.006478
  • 2.577E-10
  • 2.778E-8
  • 1.764E-10
  • 2.734E-8
  • 0.000001265
  • 0.0001213
  • 7.462E-8
  • 0.0001199
  • 0.00002883
  • 0.001354
  • 0.00006466
  • 0.001261
  • 0.0003329
  • 0.01567
  • 0.0007162
  • 0.01462
  • 0.0001078
  • 0.004753
  • 0.0001994
  • 0.004446
  • 0.00001039
  • 0.0005599
  • 0.00000348
  • 0.0005461
  • 0.02173
  • 2.479
  • 0.01152
  • 2.446
  • 0.000009786
  • 0.0003325
  • 0.00001403
  • 0.0003087
  • 0.02175
  • 2.48
  • 0.01154
  • 2.447
  • 0.0006221
  • 0.1371
  • 0.0004547
  • 0.136

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Production
A1-A3
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0.2445
  • 6.341
  • 0.0718
  • 6.025
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.742E-10
  • 7.778E-10
  • 5.936E-12
  • 5.976E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.085E-10
  • 3E-8
  • 4.982E-11
  • 2.985E-8
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.0001953
  • 0.1067
  • 0.00006018
  • 0.1065
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0.1131
  • 3.293
  • 0.02699
  • 3.153
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 9.83E-10
  • 2.368E-8
  • 3.879E-10
  • 2.231E-8