Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: 76/105 Group window wooden with aluminium cladding with 15 kg wood frame (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location RER
Geographical representativeness description The geographical reference area is Europe or Global and can be seen in the system description boundary table.
Reference year 2021
Name
76/105 Group window wooden with aluminium cladding with 15 kg wood frame
Use advice for data set The products are used as enclosures for openings in facades of buildings. The indented uses are in domestic and commercial locations. UN CPC code: 4212
Technical purpose of product or process The products are used as enclosures for openings in facades of buildings. The indented uses are in domestic and commercial locations. UN CPC code: 4212
Synonyms wooden window
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 7.8.02 Komponenten von Fenstern und Vorhangfassaden / Fenster / Holz-Metallfenster
General comment on data set 76/105 Group window wooden and wooden with aluminium cladding is triple-glazed and has a thermal transmittance of 1,2 W/(m2*K). The dimensions (height x width) are made according to the customer's requirements. The calculation is based on the assumption that LCA results are scalable for the desired window dimension. The product is manufactured in Ventspils, Latvia, and marketed internationally. Kiwa-Ecobility Experts shall not be liable with respect to manufacturer information, life cycle assessment data and evidence.
Scenarios
  • Scenario: Standard scenario (Default) - All installed raw materials of the product were analysed, and the masses were determined following the allocation and cut-off requirements. Production-specific energy consumption were measured and provided by SIA ARBO Windows. Since the production process is quite similar for all of the products produced at the manufacturing site, the energy consumption, ancillary materials and production waste is allocated according to the annual production of the standard sized elements and then declared per square meter of the product. The total annual production data is recorded to a high standard of accuracy and precision. The production waste of wood, paint and other mixed production waste is collected separately. Wood waste is thermally recovered at the site. As the product is marketed internationally, no country-specific waste scenario can be considered. Therefore, the waste scenario of PCR B (EN 17213 Appendix B.3) was adopted. Removing the window does not result in any emissions to air or soil, so the value for module C1 is assumed to be zero.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Data set LCA report, background info
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • layer thickness: 0.105 m
    • grammage: 43.01 kg/m^2
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Time representativeness description 2021 annual average
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system This EPD covers the 76/105 Group wood and wood aluminium clad windows. The windows are outward-opening customized building components with different mode of action (e.g. fixed, top hung, side hung, top swing, side swing). Dimensions (height x width) are adapted according to customer's requirements. 76/105 Group windows includes the following products: 76/105 Top Swing Window – Wood; 76/105 Top Swing Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 76/105 Side Hug Window – Wood; 76/105 Side Hug Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 76/105 Side Swing Window – Wood; 76/105 Side Swing Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 76/105 Top Hug Window – Wood; 76/105 Top Hug Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 76/105 Fix Window – Wood; 76/105 Top Swing Opus Window – Wood; 76/105 Top Swing Opus Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 62/105 Window – Wood; 62/105 Window – Wood with aluminium cladding; 92/115 Window – Wood; 92/115 Window – Wood with aluminium cladding. The products included in the 76/105 Group are very similar products and go through the same production steps. A wooden frame is identified to be the single highest contributor to the differences within the declared group of products. The products with the wooden frame of 15 kg are as follows: 76/105 Side Swing Window, 76/105 Fix Window, 62/105 Window. And the products with the wooden frame of 25 kg: 76/105 Top Swing Window, 76/105 Side Hug Window, 76/105 Top Hug Window, 76/105 Top Swing Opus Window and 92/115 Window. The biggest total result difference between the products without aluminium cladding in mandatory LCIA categories are as follows: Eutrophication, marine (EP-fw, kg N eqv.) and Photochemical ozone formation - human health (POCP, kg NMVOC eqv.) are 7% lower for windows with wooden frame of 15 kg than with wooden frame of 25 kg. Global warming potential (GWP-total, kg CO2 eqv.) is 3% lower for windows with wooden frame of 15 kg. The biggest total result difference between the products with aluminium cladding in mandatory LCIA categories as follows: Eutrophication, marine (EP-fw, kg N eqv.) and Photochemical ozone formation - human health (POCP, kg NMVOC eqv.) are 5% lower for windows with wooden frame of 15 kg than with wooden frame of 25 kg. Global warming potential (GWP-total, kg CO2 eqv.) is 2% lower for windows with wooden frame of 15 kg. Overall, the difference is within +/-10%, for the total of modules A1-C4 across any of the core impact indicators. Given that the results are presented in two result tables for 1 m2 of a window, i.e. the results of a product with the lowest amount of wood frame of 15 kg and the highest amount of wood frame of 25 kg, respectively. In addition, LCA results of the 76/105 Group windows are declared separately for wooden windows and wooden windows with aluminium cladding. The manufacturing contains the following processes: Extraction and delivery of raw materials; Cutting and profiling; Impregnation; Assembly of frame; Priming and painting of frame; Assembly of complete product; Packing and delivery.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • flow chart window production SIA ARBO Windows Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • -6.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -40.9
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • -10.8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -70.4
Output
  • 0.0117
  • 0.000838
  • 0.00205
  • 0
  • 0.0000232
  • 0.0125
  • 0.00000247
  • 0.0153
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0855
  • 0
  • 0
  • 11.7
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.713
  • 0.0131
  • 0.0951
  • 0
  • 0.00112
  • 0.0126
  • 0.00265
  • -0.591
Output
  • 16.9
  • 4.4
  • 2.17
  • 0
  • 0.582
  • 0.536
  • 15.3
  • -4.37
Input
  • 1.05E+3
  • 96.2
  • 297
  • 0
  • 9.74
  • 8.78
  • 2.41
  • -397
Input
  • 2E+1
  • 0
  • 1.32
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00306
  • 0.000586
  • 0.00118
  • 0
  • 0.0000602
  • 0.0000384
  • 0.0000151
  • -0.00167
Input
  • 432
  • 1.6
  • 1.9E+2
  • 0
  • 0.115
  • 0.841
  • 0.0405
  • -112
Input
  • 2.1E+2
  • 0
  • 35
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.95
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.07E+3
  • 96.2
  • 298
  • 0
  • 9.74
  • 8.78
  • 2.41
  • -397
Input
  • 642
  • 1.6
  • 225
  • 0
  • 0.115
  • 0.841
  • 0.0405
  • -112

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
  • 1E+3
  • 90.6
  • 278
  • 0
  • 9.17
  • 8.22
  • 2.27
  • -3.7E+2
  • 0.00214
  • 0.000145
  • 0.000463
  • 0
  • 0.0000154
  • 0.0000193
  • 5.93E-7
  • 0.00782
  • 0.65
  • 0.0365
  • 0.138
  • 0
  • 0.00353
  • 0.0091
  • 0.00071
  • -0.129
  • 0.00000643
  • 0.00000129
  • 0.00000283
  • 0
  • 1.34E-7
  • 1.05E-7
  • 3.33E-8
  • -0.00000325
  • 0.00333
  • 0.0000822
  • 0.000318
  • 0
  • 0.00000613
  • 0.0000294
  • 8.58E-7
  • -0.000816
  • 0.104
  • 0.0118
  • 0.0277
  • 0
  • 0.00124
  • 0.00313
  • 0.000282
  • -0.0168
  • 1.18
  • 0.131
  • 0.329
  • 0
  • 0.0137
  • 0.0358
  • 0.00284
  • -0.192
  • -24.2
  • 0.00485
  • 6.91
  • 0
  • 0.000281
  • 25.5
  • 1.4
  • -0.283
  • 87.6
  • 6.14
  • 19.1
  • 0
  • 0.608
  • 1.75
  • 0.0784
  • -24.8
  • 0.351
  • 0.003
  • 0.02
  • 0
  • 0.000223
  • 0.000533
  • 0.0000208
  • -0.326
  • 63.8
  • 6.15
  • 26
  • 0
  • 0.609
  • 27.2
  • 1.48
  • -25.4
  • 0.342
  • 0.0392
  • 0.0913
  • 0
  • 0.00391
  • 0.00952
  • 0.000835
  • -0.0736
  • 19.4
  • 0.367
  • 3.52
  • 0
  • 0.0328
  • 0.178
  • 0.0184
  • -0.14

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2.29E+3
  • 91.8
  • 365
  • 0
  • 8.18
  • 56.2
  • 62.9
  • -289
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.54E-7
  • 5.5E-9
  • 2.1E-8
  • 0
  • 2.65E-10
  • 6.12E-8
  • 3.2E-11
  • -4.56E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.00000238
  • 1.04E-7
  • 2.44E-7
  • 0
  • 8.95E-9
  • 3.98E-8
  • 9.21E-10
  • -3.14E-8
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 2.83
  • 0.383
  • 1.2
  • 0
  • 0.0384
  • 0.0344
  • 0.00968
  • -1.73
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 4.25E+3
  • 63.1
  • 1.12E+3
  • 0
  • 7.95
  • 8
  • 4.97
  • -75.4
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00000767
  • 5.67E-7
  • 0.00000311
  • 0
  • 5.47E-8
  • 9.07E-8
  • 1.47E-8
  • -0.00000132