Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: 76/105 Group door wooden with 17.5 kg wood frame with aluminium cladding (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location RER
Geographical representativeness description The geographical reference area is Europe or Global and can be seen in the system description boundary table.
Reference year 2021
Name
76/105 Group door wooden with 17.5 kg wood frame with aluminium cladding
Use advice for data set The products are used as enclosures for openings in facades of buildings. The indented uses are in domestic and commercial locations. UN CPC code: 42120
Technical purpose of product or process The products are used as enclosures for openings in facades of buildings. The indented uses are in domestic and commercial locations. UN CPC code: 42120
Synonyms wooden door
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 7.6.03 Komponenten von Fenstern und Vorhangfassaden / Türen und Tore / Holz
General comment on data set 76/105 Group door wooden and wooden with aluminium cladding is triple-glazed and has a thermal transmittance of 1,2 W/(m2*K). The dimensions (height x width) are made according to the customer's requirements. The calculation is based on the assumption that LCA results are scalable for the desired door dimension. The product is manufactured in Ventspils, Latvia, and marketed internationally. Kiwa-Ecobility Experts shall not be liable with respect to manufacturer information, life cycle assessment data and evidence.
Scenarios
  • Scenario: Standard scenario (Default) - All installed raw materials of the product were analysed, and the masses were determined following the allocation and cut-off requirements. Production-specific energy consumption were measured and provided by SIA ARBO Windows. Since the production process is quite similar for all of the products produced at the manufacturing site, the energy consumption, ancillary materials and production waste is allocated according to the annual production of the standard sized elements and then declared per square meter of the product. The total annual production data is recorded to a high standard of accuracy and precision. The production waste of wood, paint and other mixed production waste is collected separately. Wood waste is thermally recovered at the site. As the product is marketed internationally, no country-specific waste scenario can be considered. Therefore, the waste scenario of PCR B (EN 17213 Appendix B.3) was adopted. Removing the door does not result in any emissions to air or soil, so the value for module C1 is assumed to be zero.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Data set LCA report, background info
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • layer thickness: 0.105 m
    • grammage: 44.07 kg/m^2
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Time representativeness description 2021 annual average
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system This EPD covers the 76/105 Group wood and wood aluminium clad doors. The doors are outward opening customized building components. Dimensions (height x width) are adapted according to customer's requirements. The results are an average of the whole group. 76/105 Group doors includes the following products: 76/105 Balcony doors – Wood; 76/105 Balcony doors – Wood with aluminium cladding; 92/115 Doors – Wood; 92/115 Doors – Wood with aluminium cladding. The products included in the 76/105 Group are very similar products and go through the same production steps. A wooden frame is identified to be the single highest contributor to the differences within the declared group of products. The products with the wooden frame of 17,5 kg are 76/105 Balcony doors, the products with the wooden frame of 22,50 kg are 92/115 Doors. The biggest total result difference between the products without aluminium cladding in mandatory LCIA categories are as follows: Eutrophication, marine (EP-fw, kg N eqv.) and Photochemical ozone formation - human health (POCP, kg NMVOC eqv.) are 4% lower for doors with wooden frame of 17,5 kg than with wooden frame of 22,5 kg. Global warming potential (GWP-total, kg CO2 eqv.) is 2% lower for doors with wooden frame of 17,5 kg. The biggest total result difference between the products with aluminium cladding in mandatory LCIA categories are as follows: Eutrophication, marine (EP-fw, kg N eqv.) and Photochemical ozone formation - human health (POCP, kg NMVOC eqv.) are 3% lower for doors with wooden frame of 17,5 kg than with wooden frame of 22,5 kg. Global warming potential (GWP-total, kg CO2 eqv.) is 1% lower for doors with wooden frame of 17,5 kg. Overall, the difference is within +/-10%, for the total of modules A1-C4 across any of the core impact indicators. Given that the results are presented in two result tables for 1 m2 of a door, i.e. the results of a product with the lowest amount of wood frame of 17,5 kg and the highest amount of wood frame of 22,5 kg, respectively. In addition, LCA results of the 76/105 Group doors are declared separately for wooden doors and wooden doors with aluminium cladding. The manufacturing contains the following processes: Extraction and delivery of raw materials; Cutting and profiling; Impregnation; Assembly of frame; Priming and painting of frame; Assembly of complete product; Packing and delivery.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • flow chart 76/105 Group doors Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • -6.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -47.1
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • -10.8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -81.1
Output
  • 0.012
  • 0.000623
  • 0.00331
  • 0
  • 0.0000248
  • 0.0132
  • 0.00000259
  • 0.0163
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.152
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1E+1
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.64
  • 0.0113
  • 0.056
  • 0
  • 0.00119
  • 0.0138
  • 0.00278
  • -0.624
Output
  • 14.8
  • 4.21
  • 1.82
  • 0
  • 0.62
  • 0.554
  • 16.1
  • -4.47
Input
  • 979
  • 86.2
  • 212
  • 0
  • 10.4
  • 8.67
  • 2.53
  • -423
Input
  • 19.7
  • 0
  • 1.78
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0028
  • 0.000527
  • 0.000786
  • 0
  • 0.0000642
  • 0.0000366
  • 0.0000158
  • -0.00181
Input
  • 4.8E+2
  • 1.33
  • 144
  • 0
  • 0.122
  • 0.781
  • 0.043
  • -122
Input
  • 245
  • 0
  • 35
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.828
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 998
  • 86.2
  • 214
  • 0
  • 10.4
  • 8.67
  • 2.53
  • -423
Input
  • 724
  • 1.33
  • 179
  • 0
  • 0.122
  • 0.781
  • 0.043
  • -122

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
  • 935
  • 81.2
  • 199
  • 0
  • 9.77
  • 8.11
  • 2.38
  • -393
  • 0.00214
  • 0.000131
  • 0.000732
  • 0
  • 0.0000164
  • 0.0000174
  • 6.19E-7
  • 0.00826
  • 0.633
  • 0.0329
  • 0.105
  • 0
  • 0.00376
  • 0.00932
  • 0.000747
  • -0.133
  • 0.00000607
  • 0.00000116
  • 0.0000019
  • 0
  • 1.43E-7
  • 1.1E-7
  • 3.5E-8
  • -0.00000354
  • 0.00295
  • 0.000069
  • 0.000275
  • 0
  • 0.00000654
  • 0.0000278
  • 9.15E-7
  • -0.000807
  • 0.101
  • 0.0108
  • 0.021
  • 0
  • 0.00132
  • 0.00333
  • 0.000298
  • -0.0171
  • 1.16
  • 0.12
  • 0.247
  • 0
  • 0.0146
  • 0.0381
  • 0.00299
  • -0.196
  • -28.7
  • 0.00389
  • 4.68
  • 0
  • 0.000299
  • 28.7
  • 1.58
  • -0.339
  • 83.1
  • 5.48
  • 14.5
  • 0
  • 0.648
  • 2.01
  • 0.0833
  • -25.4
  • 0.307
  • 0.00253
  • 0.00691
  • 0
  • 0.000237
  • 0.000516
  • 0.0000221
  • -0.346
  • 54.7
  • 5.48
  • 19.1
  • 0
  • 0.648
  • 30.7
  • 1.66
  • -26.1
  • 0.325
  • 0.0353
  • 0.0686
  • 0
  • 0.00417
  • 0.0101
  • 0.000879
  • -0.0702
  • 17
  • 0.319
  • 2.8
  • 0
  • 0.035
  • 0.193
  • 0.0192
  • 0.121

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2.08E+3
  • 79.9
  • 305
  • 0
  • 8.71
  • 58.8
  • 66.4
  • -254
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.11E-7
  • 4.32E-9
  • 1.56E-8
  • 0
  • 2.83E-10
  • 6.87E-8
  • 3.38E-11
  • -4.83E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.00000189
  • 8.96E-8
  • 1.99E-7
  • 0
  • 9.53E-9
  • 3.98E-8
  • 9.77E-10
  • -3.61E-7
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 2.52
  • 0.342
  • 0.791
  • 0
  • 0.0409
  • 0.0331
  • 0.0102
  • -1.9
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 4.87E+3
  • 59.6
  • 971
  • 0
  • 8.47
  • 6.88
  • 5.23
  • -82.8
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00000754
  • 5.01E-7
  • 0.00000228
  • 0
  • 5.83E-8
  • 9.02E-8
  • 1.54E-8
  • -0.00000132