Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: ALPOLIC™ Composites (en) en de

A more recent version of this data set exists in the database.

Most recent version of this data set:00.00.062

Key Data Set Information
Location DE
Geographical representativeness description The geographical reference area is Germany (Wiesbaden).
Reference year 2021
Name
ALPOLIC™ Composites
Use advice for data set ALPOLIC™ composites are ideal for architectural projects, they can be easily processed into complex shapes and are easy to install. At the same time, they offer excellent flatness, durability, stability, vibration damping and ease of maintenance. This makes them suitable for curtain walls, rainscreen systems and other architectural cladding applications. ALPOLIC™ can be machined with standard woodworking or metalworking tools without the need for special tools. Cutting, grooving, punching, drilling, bending, rolling and many other manufacturing techniques can be easily performed to create an almost unlimited variety of complex shapes and forms.
Technical purpose of product or process ALPOLIC™ composites are ideal for architectural projects, they can be easily processed into complex shapes and are easy to install. At the same time, they offer excellent flatness, durability, stability, vibration damping and ease of maintenance. This makes them suitable for curtain walls, rainscreen systems and other architectural cladding applications. ALPOLIC™ can be machined with standard woodworking or metalworking tools without the need for special tools. Cutting, grooving, punching, drilling, bending, rolling and many other manufacturing techniques can be easily performed to create an almost unlimited variety of complex shapes and forms.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 4.3.01 Metalle / Aluminium / Aluminiumbleche
General comment on data set ALPOLIC composites are manufactured by Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH - Alpolic Division, based in Wiesbaden. An average product from the product range ALPOLIC™ A1 and A2 ACM, ALPOLIC™ fr ACM and ALPOLIC™ real anodised was considered. The environmental impacts were shown for the product with the highest raw density. The declaration owner is liable for the underlying information and evidence, any liability of Kiwa-Ecobility Experts with regard to manufacturer information, LCA data and evidence is excluded.
Scenarios
  • Scenario: Standard scenario (Default) - Some of the aluminium consumed has a secondary content of 50 - 60% or > 50%. 50% was assumed in each case, which corresponds to a worst-case scenario. In the case of PE-based adhesive and protective films, rubber and resin components are partly specified in the product data sheets. For simplification and due to the low overall relevance to the result, it was assumed that the films consist exclusively of PE. For the disposal of the composites, it is assumed that the aluminium portion is recycled. Thermal recycling was assumed for the plastic portion of the core material, and landfilling was assumed for the remainder.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • layer thickness: 0.004 m
    • grammage: 7.8 kg/m^2
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Time representativeness description The production data have been recorded for the operating year 2021.
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system ALPOLIC™ Composites are thin panels consisting of two thin aluminium plates on both sides and a thermoplastic or mineral-filled, fire-retardant core. The already painted aluminium surfaces are provided with an adhesive film and subsequently laminated with the core material. ALPOLIC™ products offer a huge range of surface types, colours and gloss levels for buildings. They are coated with robust and stable polymer paint to keep surfaces fresh after decades of exposure to the elements. At the same time, ALPOLIC™ composites offer the rigidity of heavy sheet metal in a light-weight composite material. ALPOLIC™ Aluminium Composites (ACM) are manufactured in Wiesbaden, Germany. The product is manufactured by continuously bonding two aluminium coils on either side of an extruded thermoplastic or mineral-filled fire-retardant thermoplastic core. The aluminium surfaces have been pre-finished and coil-coated in various paint finishes before bonding.
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • Flow chart ALPOLIC™ Composites Image

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Production
A1-A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
Components for re-use (CRU)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported electrical energy (EEE)
Output
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Exported thermal energy (EET)
Output
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
  • ND
Hazardous waste disposed (HWD)
Output
  • 1.12E-7
  • 1.13E-7
  • 2.54E-11
  • 5.81E-10
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.63E-10
  • 3.9E-11
  • -8.8E-8
Materials for energy recovery (MER)
Output
  • 0
  • 0.0503
  • 0
  • 0.0503
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.17
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for recycling (MFR)
Output
  • 0
  • 0.261
  • 0
  • 0.261
  • ND
  • ND
  • 2.72
  • 0
  • 0
Use of net fresh water (FW)
Input
  • 0.149
  • 0.173
  • 0.000221
  • 0.0242
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.00665
  • 0.000192
  • -0.114
Non hazardous waste dispose (NHWD)
Output
  • 4.88
  • 4.88
  • 0.000697
  • 0.00349
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.0575
  • 3.88
  • -2.77
Use of non renewable primary energy (PENRE)
Input
  • 286
  • 301
  • 8.43
  • 6.83
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.3
  • 0.759
  • -151
Use of non renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PENRM)
Input
  • 49.1
  • 54.9
  • 0
  • 5.75
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.8E-14
  • 3E-15
  • -3.13E-13
Use of non renewable secondary fuels (NRSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Radioactive waste disposed (RWD)
Output
  • 0.0185
  • 0.0191
  • 0.00000709
  • 0.000584
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.0000841
  • 0.00000832
  • -0.0158
Use of renewable primary energy (PERE)
Input
  • 79.7
  • 83
  • 0.191
  • 3.13
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.918
  • 0.114
  • -72.4
Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PERM)
Input
  • 0.000115
  • 0.000382
  • 0
  • 0.000267
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.82E-14
  • 3E-15
  • -3.13E-13
Use of renewable secondary fuels (RSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of secondary material (SM)
Input
  • 1.51
  • 1.51
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Total use of non renewable primary energy resource (PENRT)
Input
  • 286
  • 301
  • 8.43
  • 6.83
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.3
  • 0.759
  • -151
Total use of renewable primary energy resources (PERT)
Input
  • 79.7
  • 83
  • 0.191
  • 3.13
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.918
  • 0.114
  • -72.4

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Production
A1-A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 286
  • 301
  • 8.42
  • 6.83
  • ND
  • ND
  • 1.3
  • 0.758
  • -151
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00000842
  • 0.00000882
  • 2.91E-8
  • 3.65E-7
  • ND
  • ND
  • 4.32E-8
  • 5.97E-9
  • -0.00000298
  • 0.0553
  • 0.072
  • 0.016
  • 0.000661
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.000858
  • 0.00041
  • -0.0373
  • 1.69E-8
  • 1.72E-8
  • 5.97E-14
  • 3.59E-10
  • ND
  • ND
  • 2E-12
  • 1.38E-13
  • -9.41E-11
  • 0.0000947
  • 0.0000961
  • 7.44E-7
  • 6.77E-7
  • ND
  • ND
  • 3.97E-7
  • 9.85E-8
  • -0.00000798
  • 0.00989
  • 0.0144
  • 0.00426
  • 0.00021
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.000266
  • 0.000105
  • -0.00557
  • 0.107
  • 0.156
  • 0.0468
  • 0.00223
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.004
  • 0.00115
  • -0.0605
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.0308
  • -0.149
  • -0.000109
  • -0.179
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.0011
  • -0.00171
  • -0.0409
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 15.6
  • 16.8
  • 0.644
  • 0.495
  • ND
  • ND
  • 2.72
  • 0.0579
  • -10.4
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.00358
  • 0.00517
  • 0.00125
  • 0.000337
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.0000353
  • 0.000107
  • -0.00207
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 15.7
  • 16.6
  • 0.645
  • 0.316
  • ND
  • ND
  • 2.73
  • 0.0563
  • -10.5
  • 0.0315
  • 0.044
  • 0.0119
  • 0.000571
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.00069
  • 0.000319
  • -0.017
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.28
  • 1.32
  • 0.00249
  • 0.0377
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.274
  • 0.00633
  • -0.42

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Standard scenario (Default)
Production
A1-A3
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Default)
Manufacturing
A3
Standard scenario (Default)
De-construction
C1
Standard scenario (Default)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Default)
Waste processing
C3
Standard scenario (Default)
Disposal
C4
Standard scenario (Default)
Recycling Potential
D
Standard scenario (Default)
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 113
  • 1.2E+2
  • 5.02
  • 2.04
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.532
  • 0.425
  • -53.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 7.02E-9
  • 1.04E-8
  • 9.2E-11
  • 3.3E-9
  • ND
  • ND
  • 4.03E-11
  • 6.49E-11
  • -2.7E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.54E-7
  • 1.61E-7
  • 4.26E-9
  • 3.37E-9
  • ND
  • ND
  • 2.16E-9
  • 7.18E-9
  • -7.5E-8
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 3.58
  • 3.63
  • 0.00108
  • 0.0475
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.00837
  • 0.000906
  • -3.14
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 19.3
  • 53.3
  • 1.04
  • 33
  • ND
  • ND
  • 0.647
  • 0.165
  • -8.93
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 7.82E-7
  • 0.00000108
  • 2.71E-7
  • 2.84E-8
  • ND
  • ND
  • 4.86E-9
  • 5.05E-9
  • -5.88E-7